<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadsignmath.com/rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadsignmath.com</link>
	<description>driving + math = fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathematrucker</title>
		<link>http://www.roadsignmath.com/rules/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>mathematrucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadsignmath.com/rules/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>From a purely mathematical and aesthetic viewpoint my first impression of the math specifications is that they are both too liberal and too contrived, but on the other hand until I try out the game myself, I will have to assume they are appropriate.

A different, simpler version of the game that springs to mind would be to restrict all allowable symbols to the ten digits, the four basic operations of arithmetic, the equals sign, and parentheses.  A further simplification would be to disallow the use of any numbers greater than 9 by requiring all numbers to be broken down into their separate digits.

I don&#039;t know, this last suggestion might be way too liberal.  It gives rise to a potentially interesting and difficult (or even impossible) mathematical counting problem:   For n &gt; 1, given n randomly selected digits (not necessarily all distinct), what is the probability that they satisfy some equation of the above type?

Another potentially interesting thing to look for would be long strings of consecutive valid signs occurring on a single stretch of roadway.

Lastly, I don&#039;t think tautologies like &quot;7 = 7&quot; should be disallowed and I&#039;d probably even allow signs with one digit, but again, I&#039;m just guessing at this point...let me take a closer look at what&#039;s out there, with this newfound perspective in mind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a purely mathematical and aesthetic viewpoint my first impression of the math specifications is that they are both too liberal and too contrived, but on the other hand until I try out the game myself, I will have to assume they are appropriate.</p>
<p>A different, simpler version of the game that springs to mind would be to restrict all allowable symbols to the ten digits, the four basic operations of arithmetic, the equals sign, and parentheses.  A further simplification would be to disallow the use of any numbers greater than 9 by requiring all numbers to be broken down into their separate digits.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, this last suggestion might be way too liberal.  It gives rise to a potentially interesting and difficult (or even impossible) mathematical counting problem:   For n &gt; 1, given n randomly selected digits (not necessarily all distinct), what is the probability that they satisfy some equation of the above type?</p>
<p>Another potentially interesting thing to look for would be long strings of consecutive valid signs occurring on a single stretch of roadway.</p>
<p>Lastly, I don&#8217;t think tautologies like &#8220;7 = 7&#8243; should be disallowed and I&#8217;d probably even allow signs with one digit, but again, I&#8217;m just guessing at this point&#8230;let me take a closer look at what&#8217;s out there, with this newfound perspective in mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->